Beyond Social Construction: Where Depth Begins
Summary: This article explores how modern therapy often replaces inner depth with socially constructed narratives. While social construction helps explain culture and identity, it cannot explain the psyche itself. True depth psychology honors the unconscious, symbolic authority, and archetypal forces that shape transformation beyond language, identity, or social meaning.
In “When There Is No Inner Room,” I argued that contemporary psychotherapy has largely lost its capacity to hold interiority. What we have instead, often well-intentioned, sometimes helpful, are techniques, narratives, and relational warmth that remain structurally insufficient for depth work.
But I want to press further now. If the first question was what happens when interiority collapses, the next question is this: why has that collapse been so compelling, and what theoretical framework has quietly displaced depth itself?
The answer, increasingly, is some version of social constructionism.
What Social Construction Gets Right
Let me be clear from the start: social construction theory is not wrong. It corrected something real.
It exposed the naïveté of assuming that meaning is self-evident, universal, or untouched by history, power, and language. It gave us tools to see how identities, norms, roles, and institutions are shaped by culture rather than nature. It names the ways suffering can be amplified, or even created, by oppressive symbolic systems.
At the level of culture and meaning, this was necessary work.
But a correction is not the same thing as a foundation.
The Category Error
The difficulty begins when social construction quietly expands its jurisdiction, when what starts as a theory about meaning becomes a theory about the psyche itself.
And that is the category error.
Meaning is socially constructed.
Psyche is not.
When this distinction collapses, interiority doesn’t merely thin. It disappears entirely. The unconscious gets reduced to narrative. Symbols become metaphors. Transformation becomes mere reframing. And therapy shifts from initiation into something closer to collaborative meaning-making.
This is not depth psychology. It is an adaptation cloaked in therapeutic language.
Where Social Construction Actually Lives
In a depth-psychological map, social construction has a very specific location:
The collective symbolic field
The persona layer
The ego’s adaptation to culture
The intersubjective world of shared meaning
This is the realm of language, roles, norms, identities, and institutional narratives. It powerfully shapes how a person understands themselves and what kinds of experiences are permitted or forbidden.
But it is not the source of psychic life.
Dreams do not arise from discourse.
Complexes do not organize themselves around ideology.
Archetypal images do not ask permission from culture before appearing.
They arrive, often inconveniently, often disruptively, precisely because they are not constructed.
Archetypes: The Dimension That Cannot Be Negotiated
Archetypes are not stories we invent. They are patterns we encounter.
They are autonomous, pre-cultural, transpersonal. Culture supplies their clothing, images, myths, symbols, language, but not their energy. That energy presses into consciousness whether a society welcomes it or not.
This is why depth psychology insists on symbolic authority.
When archetypal forces are denied, flattened, or prematurely explained away as “just narratives,” they do not disappear. They go underground. They form complexes. They return as symptoms, obsession, inflation, and collapse.
No amount of social awareness can substitute for a lived relationship to the unconscious.
Gender, Identity, and a Persistent Confusion
This collapse is evident in contemporary discussions of identity.
Gender roles are socially constructed.
Masculine and feminine principles are not.
Identity categories are historically shaped.
The psyche exceeds identity.
Trauma narratives are culturally mediated.
Trauma itself is not.
When these distinctions are lost, individual therapy becomes preoccupied with protecting identities rather than facilitating transformation. The ego is stabilized, but the soul remains untouched.
This is not liberation. It is a subtler form of psychic containment failure.
What This Looks Like in the Consulting Room
When social construction becomes the dominant lens, certain clinical patterns reliably emerge:
Endless narrative processing
A reluctance to hold symbolic authority
The therapist positioned themselves primarily as a collaborator rather than a container
Anxieties about hierarchy, interpretation, and depth of intervention
Suffering is reframed but not metabolized
The therapy room becomes dialogical, but not initiatory.
By contrast, depth psychology understands the analytic space as a temenos: a bounded, held, symbolically charged container. The analyst’s authority is not moral or political; it is structural. Someone must hold the frame, or nothing meaningful can happen inside it.
Culture as Conditioning Field, Not Ultimate Reality
A more accurate integration sees culture as a conditioning field rather than an ontological ground.
Culture shapes adaptation.
The psyche presses toward individuation.
The task of depth work is not to dismantle culture wholesale, nor to retreat into ahistorical mysticism. It is to help individuals differentiate from collective narratives without losing symbolic orientation.
This requires verticality. It requires hierarchy, not of worth, but of depth. And it requires acknowledging that some experiences are not negotiated, co-constructed, or agreed upon. They are encountered.
After the Inner Room
If “When There Is No Inner Room” names the collapse of interiority, then this essay names what must come next.
Depth psychology preserves something essential in a time increasingly uncomfortable with it:
The autonomy of the unconscious
The authority of symbol
The necessity of initiation
The reality of inner structure
Social construction has its place. But when it becomes totalizing, it functions not as liberation but as a defense against mystery, against structure, and against the psyche’s demand to be known on its own terms.
Depth begins where construction ends. Book a session now.
Dr. Bren Hudson is a Jungian-oriented analyst in private practice. This essay is part of an ongoing series on interiority, structure, and the restoration of depth in contemporary therapeutic culture.
About the Author, Dr Bren:
Dr. Bren Hudson is a holistic psychotherapist, life coach, and couples counselor specializing in Jungian depth psychology and spiritual transformation. With a PhD in Depth Psychology from Pacifica Graduate Institute, she integrates Jungian analysis, Psychosynthesis, and somatic practices to help clients uncover unconscious patterns, heal trauma, and foster authentic self-expression. Her extensive training includes certifications in Internal Family Systems (IFS), Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), HeartMath, Reiki, and the Enneagram, as well as studies in archetypal astrology and the Gene Keys. Formerly a corporate consultant, Dr. Bren now offers online sessions to individuals and couples worldwide, guiding them through personalized journeys of healing and self-discovery.
Connect with Dr. Bren:
FAQ's
1. What is the main argument of this essay?
It argues that social construction explains meaning and culture but cannot replace depth psychology, which works with the unconscious and inner structure.
2. Is social constructionism being rejected here?
No. It’s valued for understanding culture, but criticized when treated as a full theory of the psyche.
3. What does “depth” mean in this context?
Depth refers to unconscious processes, archetypes, symbols, and inner experiences that exist beyond narrative or identity.
4. How does this affect psychotherapy?
Therapy risks becoming surface-level when it focuses solely on stories and collaboration, rather than symbolic containment and transformation.
5. Why are archetypes important?
Archetypes are universal psychic patterns that shape experience regardless of culture and must be engaged, not explained away.
Need Help? Contact Dr Bren
Animate your Soul for Life!
Send me a message right now to get started on your soulful journey. Together, we will create a coaching plan that is unique and perfect for you.
DR BREN | Buddhist and Jungian Psychology
207 Wendover Ln, Durham, NC 27713, United States
Mobile +1 919-407-0999 Email Bren@drbren.com
